Nobody wants to see a television show or a movie flop so hard they receive a 0% on the film and television review aggregation website Rotten Tomatoes. The makers, cast, and crew definitely don't want to see it happen either. But John Travolta's seen it three times.

There are only 44 films that have ranked a dreaded 0% on the site, which is thankfully not a lot, realistically speaking, when you think about the billions of films that have come out each year. But unfortunately, John Travolta is the only actor to hold the record for having three films on the list.

With three movies on the list, it's a wonder that Travolta's career was able to stay alive. He's had some career highs, saved a lot of films, and at one point, turned down one Oscar-winning film for another, choosing to do Quentin Tarantino's Pulp Fiction instead of Forrest Gump. But he's also ruined a lot of films at the same time, so he's lucky he only has three on the list.

Here are the three Travolta films that managed to score 0%.

The First Movie To Recieve O%

The first of Travolta's failed films and the first film to even receive the low score is 1983's Stayin Alive, the sequel to Travolta's successful Saturday Night Fever. The 0% was based on 25 reviews. The average rating came to 2.68/10.

For Saturday Night Fever, Travolta earned an Academy Award nomination for Best Actor. The film's soundtrack, written by the BeeGees, is one of the most successful film soundtracks of all time. It's considered a box office success, grossing $237.1 million worldwide on a meager budget of $3.5 million, and it received a score of 82% on Rotten Tomatoes. Critics raved about it.

It's sequel, not so much. Stayin Alive, which takes its name from the hit song written by the BeeGees for Saturday Night Fever, saw Travolta reprise his role of Tony Manero and, weirdly enough, saw Sylvester Stallone directing. However, it wasn't exactly a box office flop earning $127 million on a $22 million budget.

The film saw Tony trying to make it big as a professional dancer. There's scandal, drama, and a Broadway play at the center of the film and ends with Tony, now a success, strutting down Time Square, paralleling his similar strut from the beginning of Saturday Night Fever.

Related: Here's How John Travolta Is Coping With The Passing Of His Wife And Son, Jett

Rotten Tomatoes consensus said, "This sequel to Saturday Night Fever is shockingly embarrassing and unnecessary, trading the original's dramatic depth for a series of uninspired dance sequences."

Janet Maslin of The New York Times wrote, "A sequel with no understanding of what made its predecessor work." Roger Ebert called the dance productions "laughably gauche," especially the final number.

Look Who's...Not Watching

The second failed Travolta film came with 1993's Look Who's Talking Now, the third film in the series that started with Look Who's Talking. It featured Travolta opposite Kirstie Alley, reprising their roles as James and Mollie Ubriacco. The family's dogs, voiced by Danny DeVito and Diane Keaton, talk to each other, just like the babies in the first film. That's really all you need to know about the plot.

Related: John Travolta Still Has A $170 Million Net Worth, So What Does He Spend On?

As you probably guessed, the film tanked and lost about $10 million, making $10,340,263 on a budget of $22 million, and all Rotten Tomatoes had to say about it was, "Look Who's Talking Now: Look away."

Rita Kempley of The Washington Post wrote, "A crude and mawkish film in which dogs attempt to communicate with Kirstie Alley and John Travolta." At the same time, Roger Ebert said the film "looks like it was chucked up by an automatic screenwriting machine." Fair enough.

Travolta Can Not Play A Gangster

Travolta's most recent film to receive the 0% rating is 2018's biographical crime drama, Gotti, about the New York gangster John Gotti. The film also featured Travolta's wife Kelly Preston played Gotti's wife, Victoria. It was her final film before her death last year.

Despite bring husband and wife together, it was a flop, with a disastrous period of development. Its release date was constantly set back for various reasons; therefore, it failed both critically and commercially. It made only $6 million on a $10 million budget.

Related: How Ella Bleu Travolta Is Following In Her Dad's Footsteps

It also managed to receive six Razzies, including Worst Picture and Worst Actor for Travolta, at the 39th Golden Raspberry Awards.

This time Rotten Tomatoes had an even shorter review, "Fuhgeddaboudit," phonetically spelled the way Italian New Yorkers pronounce "forget about it." There was, however, a little controversy with the site's numbers. Some found that there seemed to be a disparity between the high audience score and the non-existent critic score. But Rotten Tomatoes released a statement saying, "All of the ratings and reviews were left by active accounts," and they never found evidence of tampering.

Other than that, pretty much every reviewer gave it negative reviews, although some thought the makeup was good.

Peter Travers of Rolling Stone wrote, "Starring in this mobster biopic that deserves to get whacked is an offer Travolta should have refused. Insane testimonials from Gotti supporters at the end are as close as this s---show will ever get to good reviews."

It's sad when you see a film with a 0% score on Rotten Tomatoes, but ultimately, we shouldn't let reviews dictate what we watch, and we found that out with Gotti. You should watch a film if it looks good to you, not based on what others say, that way it's fair, and a film has a better chance of stayin alive.

Next: Will Smith Reveals His New Netflix Docuseries Has A 100% Rating On Rotten Tomatoes